Research on the Development of Family Farms in Chongqing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the general train of thought of the type study, firstly has analyzed the current situation and problems of the development of family farm in Chongqing, and secondly explored the deep reasons for the problems, finally puts forward the corresponding countermeasures. The results indicates that: In recent years, the family farm in Chongqing develop rapidly, and has obtained certain achievements, but there are still some problems, such as the scale of family farm is small, low degree of organization, weak investment capacity, narrow financing channels, management level is not high, lack of talent, industry distribution area is not outstanding, policy benefit is not wide enough and other issues; the causes of these problems have the restriction of the natural environment, the restriction of land circulation, the restriction of the agricultural socialized service system and the restriction of family farmers’ comprehensive quality. Thus, according to the above restriction conditions, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it