MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188798898 · doi:10.13039/501100000780

Spiders of Albania - Faunistic and Zoogeographical Review (Arachnida: Araneae)

2011· article· en· W2188798898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolarcticFaunaSpiderEndemismEcologyBalkan peninsulaMediterranean climateGeographyZoogeographyBiologyZoologyGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spider fauna of Albania is still insuffi ciently studied. The present list was compiled after a critical
\nreview of the existing literature data and taxonomic review of some available collections. The study
\ncomprises 335 species from 36 families. In this number, 197 species are new to the spider fauna of the
\ncountry. According to their current distribution the species can be assigned to 18 zoogeographical categories,
\ngrouped into 5 complexes (Cosmopolitic, Holarctic, European, Mediterranean, Endemics). Dominant
\nare Holarctic species (56.4%) followed by European (16.4%) and Mediterranean (16.2%). The endemics
\n(8%) are also well presented and refl ect the local character of the fauna and the main role of the Balkan
\nPeninsula in its origin and formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.318
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it