MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188858215

Saivacharyas and Foot Print Worship

2005· article· en· W2188858215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sasanka Sekhar Panda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorshipAncient historyCultClubArtQuarter (Canadian coin)Gautama BuddhaArt historyDharmaBuddhismVisual artsFoot (prosody)HistoryArchaeologyCartographyGeographyTheologyMedicineLiteraturePhilosophyAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the temple-precint of Dhavalesvara temple at Mohangiri in the Kalahandi district, where the flair of steps discend to the pond in the southern side, two stone-blocks of the collapsed temple are kept; one, depicting a lady waistup, right-hand seen to be in Abhayamudra placed in between both her breasts and another, that of a seated male in Yogasana with Jatabhara on his head and a staff placed in a suspended position in between his hands, which are folded in obeisance. This figure can be taken as that of Lakulisa, a great religious teacher and the founder of the Pasupata sect of Saivism in the first quarter of the 2nd century A.D. It is believed that Lakulisa-Pasupata cult was brought to Kosala and Kalinga in the 4th century A.D. in the train of the military campaign of the Gupta monarch Samudragupta. Lakulisa images with Lakuta (club) in hand, seated in Yogasana posture and Dharma Chakra Pravartana mudra (of Buddha) are found in the Parasuramesvara and Bharatesvara temples of Bhubaneswar, which were built in the 7th century A.D. and the last temple bearing the Lakulisa image in coastal Orissa is the Muktesvara temple of Bhubanesvara which is believed to be architecturally marked by parting of ways between the Bhaumakara and Somavamsi periods. Muktesvara temple is dated to the second half of the 10th century

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207