MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189003114

Interpolation artifacts and bidimensional ensemble empirical mode decomposition

2014· article· en· W2189003114 on OpenAlexaff
Jiajun Han, Mirko van der Baan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformTime–frequency analysisInstantaneous phaseFrequency domainAnalytic signalSignal processingMathematicsWaveletInterpolation (computer graphics)Mode (computer interface)Nonlinear systemSIGNAL (programming language)Fourier transformNoise (video)Time domainAlgorithmSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisComputer scienceStatisticsPhysicsWhite noiseImage (mathematics)Filter (signal processing)Digital signal processingComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method developed by Huang et al. (1998) is a powerful signal analysis technique for non-stationary and nonlinear systems. EMD decomposes a signal into a sum of intrinsic oscillatory components, called Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs). Each IMF has different frequency components, potentially highlighting different geologic and stratigraphic information (Magrin-Chagnolleau & Baraniuk, 1999; Han & Van der Baan, 2011). Furthermore, high-resolution time-frequency analysis is possible by combining EMD with the instantaneous frequency. The resulting time-frequency resolution promises to be significantly higher than that obtained using traditional time-frequency analysis tools, such as short time Fourier and wavelet transforms (Han and Van der Baan, 2013). Furthermore, Bekara & Van der Baan (2009) utilize EMD in frequency-distance (f-x) domain to suppress the random and coherent noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207