MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189072119

INTELLIGENT COMPUTER VISION SYSTEM (SAIF) FOR AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF GINSENG ROOTS QUALITY

2005· article· en· W2189072119 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Martynenko, Valerie Davidson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceThresholdingProcess (computing)SoftwareImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent computer-vision system for automated inspection of food safety and quality (SAIF) developed on the basis of compact CCD camera with IEEE-1396 interface and configurable software (IMAQ TM 6.1, Lab VIEW 7.0) is presented. It offers an extensive set of optimized functions for advanced image acquisition, segmentation, feature extraction, data analysis, spatial measurement and calibration. It also includes the ability to set up complex pass/fail decisions in order to control digital I/O devices such as PLC. The system application for online inspection of ginseng root quality during drying was developed. Area shrinkage was continuously monitored through computer-vision system by extracting morphological features with thresholding and pixels counting. Colour changes were monitored through computer-vision system as surface color intensity. Relationships between image attributes and physical parameters of drying (shrinkage/moisture, color/quality) were used for online estimation of actual moisture content and quality degradation. Testing of system proved accuracy in estimation of ginseng quality and process parameters in multi-stage drying. The feasibility of SAIF as system observer for closed-loop control is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207