MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189124963

Benefits of Mascon Construction System in Economical Area

2013· article· en· W2189124963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIJSRD : international journal for scientific research and development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormworkWork (physics)Construction engineeringMasonryActivity-based costingFacadeCivil engineeringComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringEngineeringBusinessMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the building which are constructed at Low cost. Houses are constructed for EWS (economically weaker section) people. The buildings are the monolithic structures and constructed by using the technology in which the aluminum form work are used which is very efficient compared to the method used for the construction of the conventional structures. The monolithic structure constructed by using the technology are much better in strength than the conventional structures. Also the work of construction can be done faster and there are many advantages except the high initial cost. The technology is very useful when the row houses or the number of houses are to be constructed as the work can be done faster. This paper gives the detail study on monolithic structure in terms of their construction method, costing and timing. Also gives the detailing about Mascon Construction System. The main Objective of this project is to minimize the cost of building construction , also reducing the time of construction along with multi hazards resistance. I. INTRODUCTION This is a housing building project for the urban poors. Basically this project is of AMC(Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation ). The project is undertaken by M.S.KHURANA constructions pvt. Ltd .The buildings are going to be constructed by using technology. It is a monolithic structure. There is no masonry work. Only the steel and RCC are used to construct the buildings having 1.BHK. The formwork used are special designed and made of aluminum.  What is structure? Monolithic structure is a type of structure in which a building is constructed from a single piece of material without constructing the structural elements primarily. What is structure? Conventional structure is a type of structure in which the primary structure elements are formed by system of repetitive form work .  What is MASCON CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM? Developed in the late 1970s by Canadian engineer WJ Malone, the Mascon Construction System is a system for forming the cast-in-place concrete structure of a building. The Mascon System has been used successfully throughout the world over a period of more than 25 years to construct thousands of housing units of all heights and sizes. The Mascon System is most effective when combined with load- bearing wall structural design. It is fast, simple, adaptable and very cost effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it