Determination of water quality index of river Asa, Ilorin, Nigeria
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rivers are indispensible freshwater systems that are necessary for the continuation of life. The aim of the study was to assess some physicochemical parameters (pH, Dissolved oxygen, Temperature, Turbidity, Total dissolved solid, Nitrate, Ammonia, Iron, Lead and Chromium) of river Asa and present the complex water quality data of the river in a form that can easily be understood by the technical and non-technical personnel. To achieve the aim, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) was applied on the analytical results of the parameters to obtain a single value that was used to rank the river at each of the sampling station. The results (41.3, 42.3, and 43.6, 52.9) of the Water Quality Index showed that three of the four stations investigated can be ranked as poor and the remaining one as marginal. The implication is that the river failed Drinking Water Quality Index and thus not suited as a source of drinking water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it