MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189215735

Atmospheric Waves as a high Reynold's number, scaling phenomena

2011· article· en· W2189215735 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingPropagatorPhysicsTurbulenceDispersion (optics)MathematicsMeteorologyMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this contribution, we pose the problem in terms of space-time localization versus delocalization of structures with the help of space-time propagators obeying the same space-time scaling symmetries as the turbulence. We show that the scaling implies the existence of high Re propagators corresponding to fractional rather than integer order wave equations. We then test the theory by analyzing infrared radiances measured over the southwest Pacific by geostationary satellite MTSAT at 30 km, 1 hr resolution. Building on the approach of Wheeler and Kiladis, we show that after removing a theoretical turbulent (and scaling) background from the measured spectrum, the residuals describe the observed wave-like effects with dispersion relations close to the standard gravity wave dispersion relations but with wave propagators of fractional order Hw 0.15. Waves are thus an emergent, high Re phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Wave Propagation StudiesFrench-language works237,207