OBJECT-BASED MOVING VEHICLE EXTRACTION FROM WORLDVIEW2 IMAGERY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moving vehicle detection is very important for transportation management and traffic monitoring. Due to the submeter spatial resolution of very high resolution (VHR) imagery, vehicles can be identified from this type of imagery. Furthermore, because of the slight time difference between image acquisition of onboard sensors, (i.e. Pan and MS sensors) in VHR satellite such as Quickbird and GeoEye-1, a moving vehicle is observed, by the satellite, at two different locations. Consequently, moving vehicles can be distinguished from the stationary ones by applying a proper change detection algorithm. WorldView2 possess three sensors, i.e. a Pan and two MS sensors (MS1 and MS2). Therefore, a moving vehicle is observed at three different locations. This feature together with the new spectral bands of WV2 adds opportunity to improve moving vehicle detection and extraction. This paper, utilizing an object-based framework, compares the automatic moving vehicle extraction by using the three pairs of WV2 sensors (i.e. Pan-MS1, Pan-Ms2 and MS1-MS2). The results show that of three image pairs, the MS1-MS2 is the best choice for moving vehicle extraction because of the larger time lag between MS1 and MS2 than between the Pan and MS1 or MS2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it