MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189288201 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2015.7343466

Energy-efficient subcarrier power allocation for cognitive radio networks using statistical interference model

2015· article· en· W2189288201 on OpenAlexaff
Ashok Karmokar, Muhammad Naeem, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierCognitive radioTransmitterComputer scienceInterference (communication)Channel (broadcasting)Transmitter power outputMathematical optimizationOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingElectronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)TelecommunicationsComputer networkWirelessMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the energy-optimal subcarrier power allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio (CR) networks. A CR transmitter communicates with CR receivers on a channel borrowed from licensed primary users (PUs) when PUs' transmission are detected absence on those channels. Due to non-orthogonality of the transmitted signals in the adjacent bands, both the PU and the secondary user (SU) cause mutual-interference to each other. We assume that the statistical channel state information between the cognitive transmitter and the primary receiver is known. The secondary transmitter maintains a specified statistical mutual-interference limits for all the PUs communicating in the adjacent channels. We propose iterative method based on Dinkelbach theorem using parametric objective function for the fractional programming problem. We show analytically that under a special case, the optimal power allocation follows waterfilling algorithm. Numerical results are given to show the effect of different parameters on the energy-efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207