MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189376606

Underground Utility Mapping using a Portable Sensor System

2009· article· en· W2189376606 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Chapman, Mark Tulloch, Nicholas Muth, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisAsset (computer security)Critical infrastructurePublic infrastructureHazardAsset managementProcess (computing)Risk analysis (engineering)Information systemInformation infrastructureComputer scienceTransport engineeringBusinessComputer securityEngineeringFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common concern in most governments is the renewal of infrastructure. With the aging state of the infrastructure in virtually all countries, there is a growing need to optimize the maintenance process due to the associated high capital costs. In addition, there is a recognized need for precise three-dimensional information related to the underground infrastructure due the potential hazard related to gas line strikes during construction. Unfortunately, the tragic results of many incidents have been documented over the last few years. A report from North Carolina State University states that there is one death per day (globally) due to punctured sub-surface utilities. Accurate infrastructure information will improve both municipal infrastructure renewal plans and worker and public safety on infrastructure construction sites. Case studies show that infrastructure information is often not up-to-date, or reliable, which can prohibit municipal decisions from being cost effective. By increasing the quality of the information, the confidence of infrastructure contractors will increase, and the risk of adversely contacting an underground asset will decrease, thereby elevating worker and public safety. A practical solution to this problem is the development and implementation of a mobile terrestrial photogrammetric mapping system to map exposed utilities on construction sites. This paper outlines the design of the Underground Infrastructure Mapping System (UIMS). The UIMS was designed to accurately map exposed underground utilities, and generate geospatial information for municipal underground utility databases; containing all of the necessary information to perform underground asset management. The system is comprised of three hardware components including a tablet PC, a Global

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207