Induction of NAD(P)H quinone: oxidoreductase1 inhibits carcinogen-induced aberrant crypt foci in colons of Sprague-Dawley rats.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phase II detoxifying enzymes like NAD(P)H (quinone acceptor)oxidoreductase1 (NQO1), glutathione S-transferases (GST), and UDP-glucuronyltransferases (UGT) may play an important role in preventing carcinogen-induced cancers. Inducers of these enzymes have been shown to inhibit carcinogen-induced colon tumors in rat and mouse models. However, it has not been clearly demonstrated that NQO1 contributes to this effect. We examined the effect of NQO1 inducers on colon carcinogenesis using an aberrant crypt foci (ACF) rat model. Sprague-Dawley rats were fed control diet or diet containing 400 ppm dimethyl fumarate or 200 ppm oltipraz for 7 days, and Phase II enzymes in rat colon and liver were measured. Dimethyl fumarate significantly increased NQO1 and GST activities in colon and liver but did not increase UGT activities in these tissues. In contrast, oltipraz significantly increased NQO1 activities in colon and liver and produced a small increase in GST activity in the liver but did not increase GST activity in the colon or UGT activities in the liver or colon. Sprague Dawley rats were fed control diet or diet containing 200 ppm oltipraz and then treated with the carcinogens azoxymethane or methyl nitrosourea. Both carcinogens produced ACF in all of the rat colons, but rats fed oltipraz diet had significantly fewer ACF than those fed control diet. This protective effect was reversed in rats treated with the NQO1 inhibitor, dicoumarol. However, treatment with oltipraz did not alter the distribution of crypt multiplicities in the ACF. These studies demonstrated that induction of NQO1 plays a significant role in inhibiting initiation of carcinogen-induced ACF in Sprague-Dawley rats. This provides the first direct evidence that NQO1 may play a role in preventing colon cancer. The study also found that oltipraz added to the diet of Sprague-Dawley rats selectively increased NQO1 activity in colon mucosa with no increase in GST and UGT activities in these tissues. Thus, this model will be useful for further investigating the role of NQO1 in prevention of colon cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".