MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189793277 · doi:10.13034/jsst.v8i2.64

The Connection Between Vitamin K and Bone Health

2015· article· en· W2189793277 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jamy Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin K Research Studies
Canadian institutionsEarl Haig Secondary School
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone healthVitamin D and neurologyBone mineralOsteocalcinVitaminMedicineVitamin kEndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryOsteoporosisBiochemistryAlkaline phosphatase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin K is essential to the body because it is known to help blood coagulate and activate osteocalcin, a protein involved in maintaining healthy bones. In this review, one study observing the impact of vitamin K supplementation on patients’ bone mineral densities and three studies focusing on the effects of vitamin K supplementation on the incidence of bone fractures are discussed to determine whether the vitamin may be important for maintaining bone health. While some promising results, such as an increase in bone mineral density of subjects after vitamin K supplementation arose, the conclusions reached by the four studies were not statistically significant enough to justify the importance of vitamin K in maintaining bone health. Well-controlled studies that are unbiased, statistically powerful, and focused on vitamin K’s effects on bone density are required in the future to provide further insight on whether vitamin K supplementation is a viable method of improving bone health. La vitamine K est essentielle pour le corps, car il est connu pour assister dans la coagulation du sang ainsi qu’activer l'ostéocalcine, une protéine impliquée dans le maintien de la santé des os. Ici, une étude dirigé vers les observations de l'impact de la consommation de suppléments de la vitamine K sur la densité minérale osseuse de patients, puis trois autres études portant sur les effets de la consommation de suppléments de la vitamine K sur l'incidence des fractures osseuses sont examinées afin de déterminer si la vitamine soit une facteur important dans le maintien de la santé des os. Tandis que des résultats sont révélés prometteurs, comme ceux montrant une augmentation de la densité minérale osseuse des sujets après la consommation des suppléments de la vitamine K, l’ensemble de conclusions tirées des quatre études ne présente pas suffisamment de données qui pourraient suggérer une corrélation entre la consommation des suppléments de la vitamine K et la santé des os. Des études supplémentaires portant sur les effets de la vitamine K sur la densité osseuse, mené dans des conditions contrôlés, bien conçus, impartiales, qui produiront des résultats persuasifs, sont nécessaires à être effectuer à l'avenir afin de donner un meilleur aperçu de l’effet de la supplémentation en vitamine K comme une méthode viable dans l’entretien de la santé des os.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student Science and TechnologySame topicVitamin K Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207