Les enjeux d’une nouvelle articulation de l’éthique, de la religion et de la citoyenneté à l’école
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le présent texte, nous nous intéressons à la mise en œuvre d’un programme d’éthique et de culture religieuse comme indice de la place de la religion dans la sphère publique. N’ayant pas la prétention de traiter cette question avec exhaustivité, après une mise en contexte historique qui permet de saisir l’héritage avec lequel ce programme doit composer, nous nous contenterons, en examinant le discours de divers intervenants privilégiés dans le dossier, de soumettre un certain nombre de considérations autour de quelques enjeux qui demeurent problématiques sur le plan des visées éducatives en matière de formation à l’éthique et de culture religieuse au regard de l’exercice de la citoyenneté dans une société pluraliste et démocratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".