MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189916872 · doi:10.1190/tle31111390.1

Sections/Associated Societies Focus

2012· article· en· W2189916872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kim Frankcombe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GeologySection (typography)Mineral explorationMining engineeringArchaeologyGeographyGeophysicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists was established in 1970 as a Section of SEG. It has since grown to a membership of more than 1300, of which just under a quarter live outside of Australia. Unlike SEG and EAGE, both heavily populated by oil and gas explorationists, a high percentage of ASEG's membership is mineral-oriented. This difference has more to do with history and less to do with geology. Australia's first successful oil well was not drilled until 1953, whereas gold was discovered just over 100 years earlier in 1851. Consequently, one of the earliest applications of geophysical methods to exploration in Australia, carried out by the Imperial Experimental Geophysical Survey in 1928, was aimed at mineral exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207