MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2190179764

OPTIMUM ALLOCATION OF COMPUTER RESOURCES THROUGH GOAL PROGRAMMING

2015· article· en· W2190179764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIJITR International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research - IJITR International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Mathematical Programming
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImplementationGoal programmingProcess (computing)Computer programmingProgram Design LanguageSoftware engineeringDistributed computingOperations researchProgramming languageEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allocation of computer resources is becoming an increasing problem both within and outside of computer centre, with budgets fixed and demands increasing system analyst and designers are looking for ways to more effectively and efficiently utilize existing hardware and to design better system.Goal programming model was designed to allow optimization of multi-criteria as needed in this process.This paper deals with application of goal programming to system analysis and design phase of computer implementations and usage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0110.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it