« Le luxe frivole des accessoires ». Considérations sur la peinture d'histoire européenne aux Expositions universelles de 1855 et 1867
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'Exposition universelle organisée à Paris en 1855 initie pour la première fois l'opportunité d'une confrontation des créations artistiques des différentes écoles nationales. Cet événement offre au public et à la critique la possibilité d'un bilan de l'évolution de la peinture d'histoire sur l'ensemble du continent et d'une réflexion sur son avenir. Ainsi, de nombreux auteurs proposent-ils leur analyse, qui toujours se rejoint dans le constat d'un triomphe général des formules du « genre historique ». Pourtant, le grand absent de l'événement est bien Paul Delaroche, celui dont l'influence est revendiquée par tous. Cet article vise à mettre en perspective ces considérations critiques, à un moment clé où le modèle du « genre historique » proposé par les artistes français s'impose tout en étant de plus en plus contesté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".