MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2190367165 · doi:10.1115/omae2015-41141

Two-Phase Flow Modeling in Oil and Gas Applications

2015· article· en· W2190367165 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed M. Awad, Stephen Butt

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 10: Petroleum Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTwo-phase flowMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Porous mediumPressure gradientCalibrationVolumetric flow ratePhase (matter)Materials scienceMathematicsPorosityThermodynamicsGeologyPhysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the current study, two-phase flow modeling in oil and gas applications using asymptotic analysis is presented. Examples of two-phase liquid-liquid flow in pipes, two-phase gas-liquid flow in fractures, and two-phase gas-liquid flow in porous media are presented. In the present study, a simple semi-theoretical method for calculating the two-phase frictional pressure gradient in oil and gas applications using asymptotic analysis is presented. The proposed model can be transformed into two-phase frictional multiplier as a function of the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter, X. The advantage of the new model is that it has only one fitting parameter (p). Therefore, calibration of the new model to experimental data is greatly simplified. The new model is able to model the existing multi parameters correlations by fitting the single parameter p. Comparison with experimental data for two-phase frictional multiplier versus the Lockhart-Martinelli parameter (X) is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 10: Petroleum TechnologySame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207