Large Scale Experimental Wave Impact on Walls in the Québec Coastal Physics Laboratory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present tests are conducted in the new Québec Coastal Physics Laboratory, Canada. The flume has a depth and a width of 5 m and is 120 m long. This paper presents large scale experiments of water wave impact on a vertical wall following wave runup on a mixed sand-gravel-cobble beach. This present study is concerned with advancing knowledge on rapidly varying pressure magnitude and distributions on different types of sea/river/harbor walls. Protection against extreme events and subsequent coastal erosion is a key theme of application. Herein is presented preliminary test series which has focus on forces on vertical walls. Specifically, 27 pressure sensors are mounted on the vertical wall with a total test area of 1.2 m wide and 2.4 m high and is a stiffened aluminum plate. The outer regions of the wall are made of steel to span the entire width of the tank. The wall is designed to behave as a rigid plate. The geometric model to full scale is about 1:4. The incoming waves evolve on a flat bed to climb the final 25 m on a beach with slope with constant slope of 1:10. A small regular wave train forms the basis for investigations of force patterns on the wall. Herein, our preliminary findings reported are based on selected 6 test series (18 impacts out of 150 impacts). In general, wall pressures greater than 1 MPa and 10 m run-up are easily developed even with moderate amplitude waves at the inlet. We will discuss some details of the underlying mechanism of various types of breaking and impact on the wall. The peak pressure identified on the wall with the mixed gravel beach surface was 1.23 million N/m2 occurring in 0.2 milli seconds. It was cuased by a plunging breaker with a relatively large air pocket (∼0.11 m2). It was further identified that the maximum pressure on the wall does not necessarily give the maximum jet velocity (equivalent to vertical force considered in design of on parapets). They are independent quantities in these very random rapid processes. The maximum jet velocity was in the order of 35 m/s but could higher on a different beach surface. Further, it was found that the maximum waves are not necessarily the most critical ones as the waves break and therefore dissipates its energy before reaching the wall. A plunging breaker with a relatively large airpocket with a crest tip located at the top part of the wall resulted in max. peak wall pressure. One impact case caused a near simultaneous double peak pressure generated by a plunging breaker with two relatively small airpockets (0.003 m2 and 0.01 m2). This was the impact case responsible for the max. vertical jet velocity. We further found that the max. peak water pressure of the plunging breakers had a similar order of magnitude as the max. pressure within an air pocket.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".