MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2190518251

Robert E. BABE (2000), Canadian Communication Thought. Ten Foundational Writers. Toronto, University of Toronto Press

2001· article· en· W2190518251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Pierre Chamoux

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication. Information médias théories pratiques · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyPhilosophyArtSociologyArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le titre meme de cet ouvrage traduit explicitement son propos : il s’agit d’une « these » au sens propre, c’est-a-dire d’une demarche par laquelle l’auteur s’efforce de demontrer ex post l’existence, au Canada anglophone, d’une ecole academique de la communication, dont il tente de dresser les contours et de situer la doctrine a travers la vie et l’œuvre des dix personnalites du XXe siecle qu’il a choisies pour illustrer sa these. Ces dix personnalites ont en commun (comme on dit des francoph...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication. Information médias théories pratiquesSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207