MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2190553347 · doi:10.1080/21565503.2015.1080620

“Displaced futures”: indigeneity, land struggle, and mothering in Honduras

2015· article· en· W2190553347 on OpenAlexaff
Sharlene Mollett

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitics Groups and Identities · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographyFutures contractState (computer science)SociologyPolitical ecologyGender studiesBiospherePoliticsNarrativeWork (physics)GeographyPolitical scienceEcologyAnthropologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper draws from the insights of feminist political ecology and ethnographic fieldwork in the coastal Miskito communities of the Honduran Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve. In this paper, I highlight how Miskito matriarchal land organization is challenged by both the state and Miskito men. Through a reflection of multi-scaled narratives, I argue that Miskito women “work” to counter entrenched patriarchal assumptions and racialized state development practices that deny women's labor in agriculture and undermine their means “to mother.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitics Groups and IdentitiesSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207