Factors associated with initiation of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive people who use injection drugs in a Canadian setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify behavioral, social, and structural factors associated with time from HIV seroconversion to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation among people who use injection drugs (PWID). DESIGN: Two complementary prospective cohorts of PWID linked to comprehensive ART dispensation records in a setting of universal no-cost HIV/AIDS treatment and care. METHODS: Multivariable extended Cox models of time to ART initiation among baseline HIV-seronegative PWID who seroconverted after recruitment adjusted with a time-updated measure of clinical eligibility for ART. RESULTS: We included 133 individuals of whom 98 (74%) initiated ART during follow-up at a rate of 12.4 per 100 person-years. In a multivariable model adjusted for ART eligibility, methadone maintenance therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 2.37, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.56-3.60] and a more recent calendar year of observation (AHR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.12) were associated with more rapid ART initiation, whereas informal income generation (AHR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.79) and incarceration (AHR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.97) were negatively associated with ART initiation. CONCLUSION: In this sample of community-recruited HIV-positive PWID with well defined dates of HIV seroconversion, we found that two measures related to the criminalization of illicit drug use each independently delayed ART initiation regardless of clinical eligibility. Engagement in methadone promoted ART initiation. Programs to scale-up HIV treatment among PWID should consider decreased criminalization of PWID and increased access to opioid substitution therapy to optimize the impact of ART on HIV/AIDS-associated morbidity, mortality, and HIV transmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".