Les distances du texte : « L'Évenement » d'Annie Ernaux et le récit de l'écriture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Événement d’Annie Ernaux se caractérise par une poétique qui contraste, à première vue, avec la grande tradition du récit testimonial ou mémoriel. Même si un événement extérieur déclenche en elle une longue poussée vers l’intérieur où se déplient soudainement les parois de sa mémoire, elle ne parvient pas pour autant à traduire directement cette expérience par l’écriture. Ernaux convie le lecteur à une autre mise en forme de l’existence, où l’oscillation entre l’intériorité du sujet et l’extériorité du monde, où les traversées dans les méandres de la mémoire conduisent non pas à de nouvelles représentations où, par exemple, la juxtaposition de différentes strates temporelles ou mémorielles donnerait une nouvelle profondeur au récit, mais à des réflexions sur les limites de l’autoreprésentation et, du même coup, sur la faiblesse du langage à relayer les impressions subjectives empreintes dans la mémoire. Ce texte se consacre à l’étude de cette espèce de suspicion qui devient à la fois matière du récit et, surtout, une forme inédite de mimesis.AbstractAnnie Ernaux's L’Événement is characterized by a poetic that contrasts, at first sight, with the great tradition of testimonies and memoires. Even if an external event triggers in her an urge to unviel her memories, she cannot translate this experience directly in her writing. Ernaux invites the reader to another form of existence where the oscillation between the subject's interiority and the exteriority of the world have blurred boundaries and where her memory leads not as much to new representations where, for instance, the juxtaposition between different chronological layers would offer a new depth to the story, but more precisely to new reflections on the limits of self-representation and on the weakness of language to convey the subjective impressions of footprints in the memory. This text is devoted to the study of this kind of suspicion that becomes both the story's subject matter as well as a new form of mimesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".