Anastomosis Between the Ascending Pharyngeal Artery and the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Through the Jugular Foramen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ascending pharyngeal artery (APA) may, in very rare cases, supply the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). In reported cases, when such is the case, the ipsilateral vertebral artery (VA) does not supply the PICA, and most of the time it is hypoplastic. OBJECTIVE: To describe a unique cadaveric observation of a direct anastomosis between the posterior division (neuromeningeal) of the jugular branch of the APA and the PICA, where the PICA is also supplied by a normal-size VA. METHODS: A direct connection between the APA and the PICA was examined in a cadaveric specimen using a 3-dimensional endoscope and a surgical microscope. RESULTS: The enlarged jugular branch of the posterior division of the APA entered intracranially via the jugular foramen in its pars vascularis. It then connected directly with the lateral medullary segment of the PICA. The first segment of the PICA originated from a left vertebral artery of normal size and continued its normal course beyond the junction with the jugular branch of the APA. CONCLUSION: Both the VA and the jugular branch of the APA may simultaneously supply the PICA territory. Recognition of this anatomic variant is relevant when planning surgical or endovascular treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".