MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2191336418

Analysis and studies on testing result of vegetable quality & security in Shenzhen.

2009· article· en· W2191336418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
YU Shao-zhou, Liao ChaoZi, Huang MinTong, Lin HuiChun, Liu JianHua

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo shucai · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ToxicologyPesticideQuality (philosophy)Agricultural economicsAgricultural scienceBusinessEnvironmental healthEnvironmental scienceGeographyAgronomyMedicineEconomicsBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzed the vegetable testing data from 2005 to 2008 in Shenzhen. The level of the vegetable quality and security showed the rising trend year by year,and the percent of pass for vegetable testing between months showed changes with regularity. Usually,the vegetable pass percent is the lowest in the fourth quarter to Spring Festival,while it is the highest in the third quarter. Results of studies on various kinds of pesticides harmful to vegetables indicated that the ratio of prohibitive pesticides showed downtrend year by year,but still occupied certain ratio. Sufficient attention should be paid this issue by various levels of administrative departments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo shucaiSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207