MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2191361709 · doi:10.5254/1.3547596

Bromination of Butyl Rubber in the Presence of Electrophilic Solvents and Oxidizing Agents

2000· article· en· W2191361709 on OpenAlexafffund
Gábor Kaszás

Bibliographic record

VenueRubber Chemistry and Technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
FundersBayer CanadaBayer
KeywordsOxidizing agentDehydrohalogenationHalogenationBromineChemistryElectrophileButyl rubberPolymer chemistryHydrogen bromidePhotochemistryBromideCationic polymerizationElectrophilic substitutionPhase (matter)Organic chemistryInorganic chemistryNatural rubberCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bromination of 1,4-isoprene units in butyl rubber proceeds by substitution leading to the formation of hydrogen bromide as byproduct. In-situ conversion of HBr back to bromine is possible by the use of oxidizing agents but the reaction is very slow and oxidation of the polymer may occur. The reaction is complex and is typically conducted in a two-phase system. It has been found that the rate-controlling step is the bromination of the 1,4-isoprene unit in the organic phase, and not the oxidation of HBr to Br2 in the water phase or the mass transfer of HBr or Br2 between phases. Increasing the electrophilicity of the organic phase dramatically increased the overall rate. A 90–95 wt % conversion of bromine was achieved in one minute. Side or consecutive reactions (oxidation of the polymer, hydrobromination of the unsaturation, rearrangement or dehydrohalogenation of the main product) could be avoided, allowing the synthesis of a highly uniform material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRubber Chemistry and TechnologySame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207