Violences coloniales et écriture de la transgression chez deux auteures ultra-marines : Déwé Görödé et Chantal Spitz
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article instruit un parallèle entre deux auteures du Pacifique : Déwé Görödé et Chantal Spitz, l'une kanak, l'autre polynésienne. Il montre comment ces deux femmes expriment leurs souffrances, dans une position anti-coloniale. Ceci se traduit dans l'écriture, où le refus des normes et des formes liées à la culture française est omniprésent : transgressions des genres, déconstruction des codes grammaticaux, recours à des formes linguistiques jugées « familières » ou « populaires », expression de la révolte et de la violence.... Elles assument cette nouvelle parole, et ce nouveau style d'écriture, qui est le leur, accédant ainsi à une liberté nouvelle. Colonial violences and subversive writing in Déwé Görödé and Chantal Spitz books. Abstract: Déwé Görödé and Chantal Spitz are two postcolonial writers from the Pacific, the first one is Kanak and the second one is Polynesian. These two women free and rebellious don't respect the norms in their books : they want to show the violence of the colonialism in their countries. Their style is dashing and broken : these writers don't respect the grammatical norms, as they put it, and the art of writing reflects their free state of mind. This singular writing is the affirmation of their freedom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".