MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2191726302 · doi:10.1504/ijhvs.2015.073205

An optimal gear-shifting strategy for heavy trucks with trade-off study between trip time and fuel economy

2015· article· en· W2191726302 on OpenAlex
Xinxin Zhao, Adam H. Ing, Nasser L. Azad, John McPhee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckEngineeringWeightingAutomotive engineeringFuel efficiencyDynamic programmingMATLABDiesel fuelTransport engineeringTonneWaste managementComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show how the fuel efficiency of heavy mining trucks can be improved by optimising the gear-shifting strategy. Using characteristic tests of the diesel engine, a high-fidelity model of a mining truck was built in MapleSim and a consistent low-order model was developed in Matlab. Dynamic programming was used to optimise the low-order model of the specialised off-road 30-tonne truck over a fixed route in a mining area. There were two competing objectives: fuel use and trip time, which were combined in a single objective function using weighting coefficients. A Pareto curve was created to analyse the effect of the weights on the fuel use and trip time. Applying the control strategy obtained from dynamic programming to the high-fidelity model, it is estimated that 40,000 L of fuel can be saved annually for a mine that produces 110 kilotonnes of coal per day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it