El género Mammillaria en Oaxaca: Relación entre filogenia y la distribución geográfica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se analiza la diversidad de especies del genero Mammillaria en Mexico para determinar el nivel en que se encuentra el estado de Oaxaca en cuanto a riqueza, endemismos y especies protegidas. Se determino la posible relacion filogenetica a nivel de series taxonomicas de las especies presentes en el estado de Oaxaca en relacion con tres zonas geograficas de la entidad. Oaxaca es el quinto estado en riqueza de especies del genero Mammillaria en Mexico, el tercero en especies protegidas, pero tiene el mayor numero de especies endemicas. Todas las especies de las series Longiflorae, Polyedrae, Supertextae y Sphacelatae estan en Oaxaca, y con excepcion de la serie Longiflorae que es exclusiva de Oaxaca, las especies de las otras series tambien se encuentran en otras entidades. Si bien las zonas de establecimiento de cada especie forman grupos caracteristicos de las regiones de la canada y de la mixteca, no es clara la relacion con sus series taxonomicas
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".