From Ottawa to Colombo: On Canada’s International Role at the hour of Eastphalia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La géopolitique internationale reste profondément transformée par l’émergence des grandes superpuissances non-occidentales. Ce développement apporte de nouveaux défis au gouvernement fédéral canadien qui tente depuis la fin des années 2000 de restructurer les priorités de sa politique étrangère. Les questions relevant de l’économie nationale ont amené Ottawa à placer le commerce international au cœur de sa politique étrangère. Comment conceptualiser le rôle potentiel du Canada au sein d’un système international « estphalien » ? Après un bref rappel des traits marquants de la politique étrangère canadienne ainsi que des politiques d’Ottawa envers quelques enjeux-clés contemporains, le présent article vise à mettre en lumière le rôle potentiel du Canada au sein d’un système international en transition, en évaluant les forces, les limites et les lacunes de la politique étrangère actuelle du gouvernement Harper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".