MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2192816033

A perspective on Colling wood

2013· article· es· W2192816033 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Meynell

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de filosofía (México, D.F.) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPerspective (graphical)HumanitiesEpistemologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El articulo ofrece una comparacion entre las ideas de Collingwood sobre la metafisica y la religion y algunas de las posiciones de Lonergan, especialmente aquellas relacionadas con el metodo empirico generalizado, tal como fue desarrollado en Insight. Se hace un examen minucioso de la idea de Collingwood de presupuestos absolutos y del papel que juegan en la metafisica, y tambien de su logica de pregunta y respuesta, la cual se compara con las preguntas de Tomas de Aquino quid sit? y an sit?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de filosofía (México, D.F.)Same topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207