MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2192869773 · doi:10.19030/ijmis.v18i2.8491

A Lean Innovation Model To Help Organizations Leverage Innovation For Economic Value: A Proposal

2014· article· en· W2192869773 on OpenAlexaff
Terry J. Frederick, Than Lam, Vicki Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategies and Innovation
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)BusinessValue (mathematics)Value creationKnowledge managementConceptual modelIndustrial organizationInnovation processProcess (computing)Process managementMarketingComputer scienceWork in process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a Lean Innovation Model for transforming an organization into one that leverages innovation for economic value. The model intends to address two main questions: 1) what are the best innovation transformation approaches for an organization to leverage innovation and 2) how can an organization effectively unleash its untapped innovation capability to increase economic value? How the model works, its constructs, and how it can affordably be implemented will be described. Relationships between the conceptual model and the requisite culture, process, and infrastructure needed for an organization to produce economic value from innovation will be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS)Same topicBusiness Strategies and InnovationFrench-language works237,207