MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2192916196 · doi:10.1139/p11-106

Photoionization of Al-like Si using the R-matrix method

2011· article· en· W2192916196 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jagjit Singh, Sunny Aggarwal, Alok Jha, A.K. Singh, Man Mohan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPhotoionizationRydberg formulaAtomic physicsHamiltonian (control theory)R-matrixExcited stateRelativistic quantum chemistryIonizationIonIonic bondingAutoionizationCoupling (piping)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relativistic calculations are made for photoionization of the ground state 3s23p ([Formula: see text]) and the lowest six excited states 3s23p ([Formula: see text]), 3s3p2 (4P1/2,3/2,5/2), and 3s3p2 (2D3/2,5/2) of Al-like Si, using the Breit–Pauli Hamiltonian within the R-matrix method. Cross sections are determined by the Rydberg series of autoionizing resonances converging to various ionic states. Relativistic effects as well as all the important physical effects like exchange, channel coupling, and short-range correlations have been considered in the present calculations. The present relativistic calculations for this ion using the lowest 20 target levels of Si III in the LSJ coupling scheme will enhance the database sufficiently for practical applications of photoionization cross sections of Si II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAtomic and Molecular Physics→French-language works237,207→