MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2192928913 · doi:10.1603/008.103.0401

Macroinvertebrados Bentónicos Sudamericanos—Sistemática y Biología

2010· article· es· W2192928913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macroinvertebrados Bentónicos Sudamericanos—Sistemática y Biología (in Spanish) Eduardo Domínguez and Hugo R Fernández (eds.) Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina, 2009 656 pp., soft cover ISBN 978-950-668-015-2 For a long time, the study of insects and biodiversity in general has depended on the scientific effort devoted to the taxonomy of particular biological groups. For this reason, it is no surprise that the Nearctic fauna has received considerably more attention than its Neotropical counterpart. Mexico is an exception, being adjacent to the United States, as much of the Nearctic literature could be applied with considerable success. However, Neotropical and endemic groups that are not present in the United States and Canada remain problematic. Specialists or local scientists need to be tapped as descriptions focus on the species level or on regional or local fauna. Multinational scientific efforts are needed to describe fauna from regions that cross political boundaries, and nowhere is this more true than in South America. First, South America is a huge area represented by some of the most speciesrich habitats in the world. Important geological formations, such as the Andes and the tepuyes of Venezuela, as well as a uniqueness of life forms, perhaps best exemplified by the biota of Chile, support one of the most interesting biotic areas of the world. The efforts by editors Eduardo Dominguez and Hugo R. Fernandez, from Universidad de Tucumán, Argentina, to overcome these political challenges and produce a volume on South American Benthic Macroinvertebrates should be praised. This profusely illustrated book, which has an attractive cover with a color picture of a male dobsonfly, had a former version, Guía para la Determinación de los Artrópodos Bentónicos Sudamericanos, published in 2001. The present book, with its 20 chapters, is much more than a field guide, and synthesizes information on habits, collection techniques, and morphology for each group. Genus-level keys to many of the families of freshwater macroinvertebrates (including noninsects) also are included. The first and last chapters, on sampling techniques and the use of macroinvertebrates as water quality indicators, respectively, are up-to-date versions of these subjects and are of general application to field entomologists. The core chapters are taxonomic, treating a key to orders of aquatic insects (Chapter 2), Ephemeroptera (3), Odonata (4), Plecoptera (5), Hemiptera (Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha; 6), Megaloptera (7), Neuroptera and Mecoptera (8), Trichoptera (9), Lepidoptera (10), Diptera general (11), Simuliidae (Diptera; 12), Chironomidae (Diptera; 13), Coleoptera (14), Crustacea (Syncarida, Amphipoda, Decapoda; 15), Acari (Parasitengona, Hydrachnidia; 16), Oligochaeta (Annelida; 17), Bivalvia (Mollusca; 18), and Gastropoda (Mollusca; 19). I liked the book overall, especially the high-quality illustrations. The keys are for both immature and adult stages, and the contents are thorough and updated, thanks to the 35 recognized specialists that prepared individual chapters. In particular, I am impressed by some of the chapters on the several diverse South American groups, such as Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Hemiptera, and Coleoptera. It is also noteworthy that some difficult insects groups, such as black flies (Simuliidae) and midges (Chironomidae) are thoroughly treated. Although all families receive abrief diagnosis and bibliography of essential literature, some more complex families (e.g., Tipulidae) are not treated at the genus level. The book is particularly valuable in that it discusses several noninsect groups (e.g., crustaceans, mites, oligochaetes, and mollusks) as well. Most of the authors are South American, mainly from Argentina, but also from Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador. The rest are from Germany, Mexico, Spain, and the United States. A preface by Dr. Richard W. Merritt (Michigan State University) is the only English piece in the book. One chapter is in Portuguese (Chapter 5). A prologue by the editors not only describes the process of revision and the book's construction but also emphasizes a social side of the study of freshwater macroinvertebrates, which in Latin America is crucial, due to the scarcity of freshwater resources and their recent steady decline and its implications for biodiversity. As an aquatic entomologist in Latin America, I am glad for the creation of this volume. Large, comprehensive works like this book stimulate additional studies and motivate new students to purse aquatic entomology, in both systematics and ecology. Access to highly illustrated keys and summaries of biology and ecology are welcome resources that will facilitate student theses, as well as formal research programs by universities, government agencies, and other organizations. The book can be obtained in purchase or exchange from Centra de Información Geobiológico del Noroeste Argentino (inquires should be directed to Sra. Mariángeles Prieto, e-mail: maprieto@lillo.org.ar; or biblioteca@lillo.org.ar; http://lillo.org.ar/index.php).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it