MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2192928913 · doi:10.1603/008.103.0401

Macroinvertebrados Bentónicos Sudamericanos—Sistemática y Biología

2010· article· es· W2192928913 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2010
Typearticle
Languees
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueMollusks and Parasites Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyZoology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Macroinvertebrados Bentónicos Sudamericanos—Sistemática y Biología (in Spanish) Eduardo Domínguez and Hugo R Fernández (eds.) Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina, 2009 656 pp., soft cover ISBN 978-950-668-015-2 For a long time, the study of insects and biodiversity in general has depended on the scientific effort devoted to the taxonomy of particular biological groups. For this reason, it is no surprise that the Nearctic fauna has received considerably more attention than its Neotropical counterpart. Mexico is an exception, being adjacent to the United States, as much of the Nearctic literature could be applied with considerable success. However, Neotropical and endemic groups that are not present in the United States and Canada remain problematic. Specialists or local scientists need to be tapped as descriptions focus on the species level or on regional or local fauna. Multinational scientific efforts are needed to describe fauna from regions that cross political boundaries, and nowhere is this more true than in South America. First, South America is a huge area represented by some of the most speciesrich habitats in the world. Important geological formations, such as the Andes and the tepuyes of Venezuela, as well as a uniqueness of life forms, perhaps best exemplified by the biota of Chile, support one of the most interesting biotic areas of the world. The efforts by editors Eduardo Dominguez and Hugo R. Fernandez, from Universidad de Tucumán, Argentina, to overcome these political challenges and produce a volume on South American Benthic Macroinvertebrates should be praised. This profusely illustrated book, which has an attractive cover with a color picture of a male dobsonfly, had a former version, Guía para la Determinación de los Artrópodos Bentónicos Sudamericanos, published in 2001. The present book, with its 20 chapters, is much more than a field guide, and synthesizes information on habits, collection techniques, and morphology for each group. Genus-level keys to many of the families of freshwater macroinvertebrates (including noninsects) also are included. The first and last chapters, on sampling techniques and the use of macroinvertebrates as water quality indicators, respectively, are up-to-date versions of these subjects and are of general application to field entomologists. The core chapters are taxonomic, treating a key to orders of aquatic insects (Chapter 2), Ephemeroptera (3), Odonata (4), Plecoptera (5), Hemiptera (Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha; 6), Megaloptera (7), Neuroptera and Mecoptera (8), Trichoptera (9), Lepidoptera (10), Diptera general (11), Simuliidae (Diptera; 12), Chironomidae (Diptera; 13), Coleoptera (14), Crustacea (Syncarida, Amphipoda, Decapoda; 15), Acari (Parasitengona, Hydrachnidia; 16), Oligochaeta (Annelida; 17), Bivalvia (Mollusca; 18), and Gastropoda (Mollusca; 19). I liked the book overall, especially the high-quality illustrations. The keys are for both immature and adult stages, and the contents are thorough and updated, thanks to the 35 recognized specialists that prepared individual chapters. In particular, I am impressed by some of the chapters on the several diverse South American groups, such as Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Hemiptera, and Coleoptera. It is also noteworthy that some difficult insects groups, such as black flies (Simuliidae) and midges (Chironomidae) are thoroughly treated. Although all families receive abrief diagnosis and bibliography of essential literature, some more complex families (e.g., Tipulidae) are not treated at the genus level. The book is particularly valuable in that it discusses several noninsect groups (e.g., crustaceans, mites, oligochaetes, and mollusks) as well. Most of the authors are South American, mainly from Argentina, but also from Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador. The rest are from Germany, Mexico, Spain, and the United States. A preface by Dr. Richard W. Merritt (Michigan State University) is the only English piece in the book. One chapter is in Portuguese (Chapter 5). A prologue by the editors not only describes the process of revision and the book's construction but also emphasizes a social side of the study of freshwater macroinvertebrates, which in Latin America is crucial, due to the scarcity of freshwater resources and their recent steady decline and its implications for biodiversity. As an aquatic entomologist in Latin America, I am glad for the creation of this volume. Large, comprehensive works like this book stimulate additional studies and motivate new students to purse aquatic entomology, in both systematics and ecology. Access to highly illustrated keys and summaries of biology and ecology are welcome resources that will facilitate student theses, as well as formal research programs by universities, government agencies, and other organizations. The book can be obtained in purchase or exchange from Centra de Información Geobiológico del Noroeste Argentino (inquires should be directed to Sra. Mariángeles Prieto, e-mail: maprieto@lillo.org.ar; or biblioteca@lillo.org.ar; http://lillo.org.ar/index.php).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,462
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle