MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2192939298 · doi:10.1109/twc.2015.2459714

Solving a Class of Sum Power Minimization Problems by Generalized Water-Filling

2015· article· en· W2192939298 on OpenAlex
Peter He, Lian Zhao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceMinificationResource allocationPower (physics)AlgorithmWirelessClass (philosophy)Geometric programmingMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio resource management (RRM) plays an important role in wireless communication systems, especially in more advanced systems with more constraint conditions. In this paper, we first propose a generalized water-filling approach to solve the power allocation problem of minimizing sum power while meeting the target sum rate constraint with weights. Based on this sum power objective function, we extend the proposed method to more complicated RRM problems with more stringent constraints. The proposed algorithms with this generalized approach possess several distinguished features. They provide exact optimal solutions based on non-derivative methods, as the implementation of the proposed algorithms invokes neither the derivative nor the gradient. With geometric interpretation, the proposed algorithms provide more insights into and intuitions of the problems and could be used to efficiently solve a family of the sum power minimization problems. Optimality of the proposed algorithms is strictly proved. Numerical results that illustrate the steps and demonstrate efficiency of the proposed algorithms are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it