MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2193529374 · doi:10.7202/1034065ar

L’importance de la trajectoire sociale pour l’étude des classes populaires

2015· article· fr· W2193529374 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philippe Longchamp

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Cultural Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’il est indéniable que les classes populaires contemporaines sont caractérisées par une hétérogénéité beaucoup plus forte que par le passé, il n’en demeure pas moins que cette diversité se dérobe pour partie aux tentatives de théorisation. Les travaux sociologiques semblent dès lors alterner entre descriptions empiriques et propositions de nouveaux paradigmes. Prenant au sérieux la troisième dimension de l’espace social (la trajectoire sociale) que Bourdieu avait proposée sans toutefois la mobiliser pour l’analyse des classes populaires, nous défendons ici l’idée suivant laquelle la mobilisation de cette dimension s’impose autant pour l’analyse des classes populaires d’aujourd’hui que pour celle des classes moyennes d’hier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicSocial and Cultural DynamicsFrench-language works237,207