MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2194248634

X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness

2012· article· en· W2194248634 on OpenAlexaff
Ian M. MacDonald, Stephanie Chan, Sari Tuupanen

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesAlberta HealthUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrabismusProbandRefractive errorOphthalmologyMedicineVisual acuityOptometryFundus (uterus)GeneticsMutationBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical characteristics X-linked congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is characterized by non-progressive retinal findings of reduced visual acuity ranging from 20/30 to 20/200; defective dark adaptation; refractive error, most typically myopia ranging from low (-0.25 diopters [D] to -4.75 D) to high (≥-10.00 D) but occasionally hyperopia; nystagmus; strabismus; normal color vision; and normal fundus examination. Characteristic ERG findings can help distinguish between complete X-linked CSNB and incomplete X-linked CSNB. Diagnosis/testing The diagnosis of X-linked CSNB is established in a male proband with characteristic clinical and electroretinogram (ERG) findings and a family history consistent with X-linked inheritance. Identification of a hemizygous pathogenic variant in CACNA1F or NYX by molecular genetic testing can confirm the diagnosis if clinical features are inconclusive. The diagnosis of X-linked CSNB may be established in a female proband with ERG findings suggestive of X-linked CSNB and identification of a heterozygous or biallelic pathogenic variant in CACNA1F or NYX by molecular genetic testing. Management Treatment of manifestations: Glasses or contact lenses to treat refractive error (myopia or hyperopia); conventional strabismus surgery may be required to improve binocularity or head posture. Surveillance: At a young age yearly eye examinations with refraction to identify and treat myopia as early as possible. Agents/circumstances to avoid: Reduced visual acuity and difficulties seeing at night may preclude driving a car or restrict the class of driving license. Genetic counseling By definition, X-linked CSNB is inherited in an X-linked manner. The father of an affected male will not have X-linked CSNB nor will he be hemizygous for the pathogenic variant. If the mother of the proband is a carrier, the chance of transmitting the pathogenic variant in each pregnancy is 50%. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be carriers and will usually not be affected. Males with X-linked CSNB will pass the pathogenic variant to all of their daughters and none of their sons. Carrier testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk are possible for families in which the pathogenic variant has been identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207