MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2194330931

Studying the Effects of Chemical, Physical and Medical Treatment on Some Qualities and Quantities of Valencia Orange

2013· article· en· W2194330931 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zeinab Nadimi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of academic and applied studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrange (colour)HorticultureChemistryToxicologyFood scienceMathematicsAnimal scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the effects of different treatments on longevity of Valencia orange storage a survey ,in the form of entirely random districts with 19 treatments and two sizes of the fruit (5/5 to 6 cm and 6/5 to more than7cm), is conducted. The used treatments in the study are Thiabendazole (1500 parts in million),sodium carbonate B (2%), hot water (55 C, 3 min),Thymeextract (1000 parts in million), Rosemarie extract (256, 1024, 2048 parts in million) and binary effects of hot water and Rosemarie extract, hot water and Thyme extract, Rosemarie extract and Thymeextract, and two attestors in the forms of vaccinated and unvaccinated. After making the treatments prepared and putting them in the plastic bags, fruits are kept in a usual warehouse with 20-28 c about 80 days. Base on the results, the most quantity of decay is observed through treatment attestor number2 for about 49/035 percent and the least quantity relates to treatment attestor number 1 about 6/66 percent. The most observed level of losing weight for treatment atesttornumber2 was about 11 gram decrease and 4/625 gram for treatment number 1. The highest level of vitamin C is observed with attestor number1 which was about 53.940/100 Mg/MLand the lowest level was for hot water and Rosemarie extract treatment of 1024 part in million for about 48.187/100 Mg/ML extract of fruit and it was not considerable(about 5 percent) for treatments like Thiabendazole, attestortreatment number2 and hot water. The highest level of organic acid relates to Rosemarie extract (256 in million) with .921/100 Mg/ML fruit extract which did not show any meaningful differences in their consequences in comparison with treatments like hot water and Rosemarie extract1024, hot water and Rosemarie extract 256, Rosemarie extract 2048 in million and treatment number 1. The lowest level of organiccid also did not show any meaningful difference in comparison with other treatments like what was observed with Thyme extract and Rosemarie extract 2048 treatment about .759/100 Mg/ML of fruit extract. It is inferred from the obtained results through the present study that: in comparison with other treatments, treatmentnumber1, hot water and Rosemarie extract and Rosemarie extract were more successful in their revenue. So with careful attention to environmental issues and producing organic products, it is recommended to use herbal treatments and hot water and the binary effect of hot water and herbal extracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of academic and applied studiesSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207