Transgresser pour mettre en œuvre le droit d'accéder à une vie ordinaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accompagner de la naissance à l'âge adulte des personnes trisomiques requiert beaucoup de courage, de réflexion et d'actions. Pour faire vivre "en milieu ordinaire" leur enfant déficient, des parents sont conduits à créer des liens et nouer des partenariats, expliquer, négocier des amodiations et/ou adaptations mais certaines difficultés induisent des transgressions pour compenser, dépasser à la fois inaptitudes et incompréhensions, voire incompétences et contrer des normes, méthodes et comportements. Transgressing to Implement One's Right to Ordinary Life Abstract: Caring for a person with Down syndrome from birth to adulthood requires a lot of courage, thoughts and actions. In order to allow their challenged children to live in a “regular environment”, some parents are led to create alliances and partnerships, to explain, negotiate accommodations and/or adaptations, but some obstacles introduce transgressions meant to compensate, overcome misunderstandings and shortcomings, even incompetence, while confronting norms, methods and behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".