Tourism and real estate business: the crisis of a development model. Three case studies from Canada, Argentina and Spain.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La vinculación del negocio turístico-inmobiliario con las migraciones por amenidad o por estilos de vida tiende a incubar problemas de racionalidad que, además de los ligados a la falta de sustentabilidad ambiental, acaban por volver inviable la lógica socio-económica del proceso. Para ilustrar este argumento se propone una reflexión crítica basada en la experiencia de lo acontecido en tres regiones del mundo en las que el desarrollo del modo de producción inmobiliario -basado en la captación y promoción de los tipos de movilidad residencial orientados por la búsqueda de experiencias de ocio- ha promovido efectos regresivos en relación al desarrollo local: las áreas montañosas del Oeste de Canadá, la Norpatagonia, en Argentina, y el sudeste de España, con atención a la provincia de Alicante. El artículo indaga en la falta de sustentabilidad de un modelo de desarrollo basado en el negocio turístico-inmobiliario; al tiempo que identifica patrones comunes y diferencias entre los casos analizados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".