MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2194693458 · doi:10.1142/s1793042112500972

ON THE QUATERNARY FORMS x<sup>2</sup>+y<sup>2</sup>+2z<sup>2</sup>+3t<sup>2</sup>, x<sup>2</sup>+2y<sup>2</sup>+2z<sup>2</sup>+6t<sup>2</sup>, x<sup>2</sup>+3y<sup>2</sup>+3z<sup>2</sup>+6t<sup>2</sup> AND 2x<sup>2</sup>+3y<sup>2</sup>+6z<sup>2</sup>+6t<sup>2</sup>

2012· article· en· W2194693458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Number Theory · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteger (computer science)CombinatoricsPhysicsCrystallographyChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formulas are proved for the number of representations of a positive integer by each of the four quaternary quadratic forms x 2 +y 2 +2z 2 +3t 2 , x 2 +2y 2 +2z 2 +6t 2 , x 2 +3y 2 +3z 2 +6t 2 and 2x 2 +3y 2 +6z 2 +6t 2 . As a consequence of these formulas, each of the four series [Formula: see text] is determined in terms of Ramanujan's theta function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0460.045
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0430.030
Bibliometrics0.0270.025
Science and technology studies0.0210.026
Scholarly communication0.0220.043
Open science0.0560.029
Research integrity0.0250.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it