MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2194787414 · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-551-9_14

Yellowstone to Yukon: Global Conservation Innovations Through the Years

2015· book-chapter· en· W2194787414 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harvey Locke, Karsten Heuer

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessGeographyWilderness areaExtinction (optical mineralogy)Environmental ethicsEnvironmental protectionEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FOR THE LAST ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS the Yellowstone to Yukon region of western North America has been at the forefront of conservation. For this reason it remains home to many free-flowing rivers, wild animals, beautiful national parks, and wilderness solitude. It also is home for many humans. If every region in the world were to have benefited from the same conservation actions as this rugged mountainous region there would be no global extinction crisis. Today the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative (Y2Y) seeks to build on that legacy and carry it forward as an example of a sane relationship between humans and the rest of life. The shared vision of those leading this initiative, citizens of both Canada and the United States, is to create an interconnected system of wild lands and waters stretching from Yellowstone to Yukon, harmonizing the needs of people with those of nature. It has become a symbol of hope around the world. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Press/Center for Resource Economics eBooksSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207