MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2195133150 · doi:10.2174/1874146001003010001

Explicit Exact and Third-Order-Accurate Pressure-Deflection Solutions for Oblique Shock and Expansion Waves

2010· article· en· W2195133150 on OpenAlexafffund
Dan Mateescu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Aerospace Engineering Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOblique shockAerodynamicsSupersonic speedMechanicsShock waveAirfoilHypersonic speedDeflection (physics)Riemann problemChoked flowOblique casePhysicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisRiemann hypothesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents explicit analytical solutions of the pressure coefficient and the pressure ratio across the oblique shock and expansion waves in function of the flow deflection angle. These new explicit pressure-deflection solutions can be efficiently used in solving applied aerodynamic problems in supersonic flows, such as the aerodynamics of airfoils and wings in supersonic-hypersonic flows and the shock and expansion waves interactions, and can be also used to increase the computational efficiency of the numerical methods based on the Riemann problem solution requiring the pressure-deflection solution of the oblique shock and expansion waves, such as the Godunov method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Aerospace Engineering JournalSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207