MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2195133150 · doi:10.2174/1874146001003010001

Explicit Exact and Third-Order-Accurate Pressure-Deflection Solutions for Oblique Shock and Expansion Waves

2010· article· en· W2195133150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Aerospace Engineering Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOblique shockAerodynamicsSupersonic speedMechanicsShock waveAirfoilHypersonic speedDeflection (physics)Riemann problemChoked flowOblique casePhysicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisRiemann hypothesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents explicit analytical solutions of the pressure coefficient and the pressure ratio across the oblique shock and expansion waves in function of the flow deflection angle. These new explicit pressure-deflection solutions can be efficiently used in solving applied aerodynamic problems in supersonic flows, such as the aerodynamics of airfoils and wings in supersonic-hypersonic flows and the shock and expansion waves interactions, and can be also used to increase the computational efficiency of the numerical methods based on the Riemann problem solution requiring the pressure-deflection solution of the oblique shock and expansion waves, such as the Godunov method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it