MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2195149549 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0127

A quantitative study of the forbidden and intercombination transitions arising from the Li-like Al autoionizing levels

2015· article· en· W2195149549 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cristian Iorga, V. Stǎncǎlie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitutul de Fizică AtomicăAgenția Spațială Română
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsAutoionizationLaserPlasmaPopulationFemtosecondRadiative transferIonWavelengthIonizationPhotoionizationOpticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents results from detailed quantitative description of the level population kinetics responsible for the relatively high line-intensity of the forbidden and intercombination transitions arising from autoionization states. The goal is to investigate the influence of different atomic processes on the emission spectrum of the laser-produced aluminum plasma obtained at the nhelix-laser test bed facility at GSI (PRA 63, 032716). In the experiment a Nd-glass YAG laser beam having 50 J pulse energy, 15 ns full width half maximum duration and 1.064 μm wavelength is focused on a massive Al target. To simulate the experimental reported spectrum, the population kinetics is investigated based on a collisional radiative model. The theoretical spectroscopic investigation reported here indicates the existence of anomalous high intensity X-ray intercombination and two-electron transitions arising from autoionizing states in Li-like Al ion. Detailed atomic structure calculation and kinetics modeling is performed to find out the individual states involved, and the population density distribution over them. Presented results are useful for femtosecond-laser produced plasma experiments and diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207