Changes in <scp>QT</scp>c associated with a rapid bolus dose of dexmedetomidine in patients receiving <scp>TIVA</scp>: a retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical indications for the perioperative use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric anesthesia are accumulating. However, in 2013, dexmedetomidine was added to the list of medications with possible risk of prolonging the QT interval and/or inducing Torsades de Pointes. Unfortunately, current evidence for dexmedetomidine-induced QT prolongation is sparse and somewhat contradictory. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal changes in corrected QT interval (QTc) after a rapid bolus administration of dexmedetomidine under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with a standardized propofol and remifentanil administration. METHODS: Electrocardiography (ECG) and corresponding trend data were extracted from automated electronic data capture of physiological monitoring. Ten-second epochs of ECG data were extracted in 1-min intervals for 12 min, starting 1 min before dexmedetomidine bolus administration, and ending 10 min after. QT intervals were extracted using an automated routine in MATLAB, and corrected for heart rate (HR) using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's formulas (QTcF). QTcB and QTcF were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test between baseline measurements and the subsequent four interval values. RESULTS: Data from 21 subjects (17 male) with median (range) age 7.1 (5.4-9.5) yr, weight 23.6 (16.2-36.7) kg, and height 121 (103-140) cm were analyzed. Bolus administration of dexmedetomidine reduced HR in all subjects (median 22%), and caused transient reduction of QT interval, with its peak at 1-min postbolus administration: QTcB (median reduction 30.7 ms, P < 0.001) or QTcF (median reduction 15.4 ms, P = 0.001); QT shortening became statistically insignificant 4 min following dexmedetomidine bolus administration for QTcB and 2 min for QTcF. CONCLUSION: In this study, a rapid bolus of dexmedetomidine transiently shortened corrected QT intervals. However, these effects are confounded by dexmedetomidine-induced bradycardia. These findings should be confirmed in pediatric studies without concomitant TIVA administration and with optimized correction of baseline HR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".