MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196010675 · doi:10.22605/rrh319

Differences in diabetic co-morbidity between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people living in Bella Coola, Canada

2004· article· en· W2196010675 on OpenAlex
Harvey V. Thommasen, Jana Patenaude, Nancy Anderson, A Mc Arthur, Hugh D. Tildesley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRural and Remote Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBELLAMedicineGerontologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify which medical disorders are significantly associated with being a diabetic in the setting of an isolated, rural community; and (2) to determine if there are differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal diabetics. DESIGN: population based retrospective chart review. STUDY POPULATION: people living in the Bella Coola Valley, Canada, and having a chart at the Bella Coola Medical Clinic as at September 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: known diabetes related co-morbidity (retinopathy, nephropathy, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy). RESULTS: There were 126 adult (>18 years old) diabetics living in the Bella Coola Valley. Prevalence rates for history of alcohol issues, retinopathy, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and nephropathy were 44%, 14%, 19%, 8%, 7%, 10%, 54%, 47%, and 7% respectively. For the 1597 non-diabetics living in the Bella Coola Valley, respective prevalence rates for these same co-morbidities were 20%, 0.3%, 2%, 1.5%, 1%, 1%, 10%, 6%, and 0.6%. The study did not demonstrate that Aboriginal people living in the Bella Coola Valley have an increased prevalence of diabetes associated co-morbidities over and above that found in the non-Aboriginal diabetic population. This was despite the fact the smoking rate was higher in the Aboriginal population. CONCLUSIONS: The development of diabetes in both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people living in the Bella Coola Valley was clearly associated with the presence of multiple co-morbidities, including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and neuropathy. Rates of diabetes associated co-morbidities were similar for both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal diabetic populations. The authors speculate that a diet rich in fish oils (omega-3 fatty acids) accounted for the lower than expected rates of cardiovascular disease among this Aboriginal population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it