MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196035959 · doi:10.1002/geot.201500027

Optimization of structural contact stiffness and strength for discrete simulation of progressive failure of healed structure

2015· article· en· W2196035959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomechanics and Tunnelling · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNuclear Waste Management Organization
KeywordsStiffnessDiscontinuity (linguistics)Finite element methodStructural engineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Geotechnical analysis for underground excavation design in complex tectonic environments requires an increased understanding and more rigorous consideration of the impact of healed or "intrablock" structure, such as veins, on rockmass behaviour. Intrablock structure occurs between blocks of rock defined and bounded by "interblock structure", the network of joints and other fractures conventionally considered in classic rockmass characterization, classification or rockmass property estimation. Discrete simulation of fractures has become a more commonplace model analysis technique for excavations in jointed rockmasses. Here too, however, special attention is required to simulate intrablock structure within the model. In particular, the selection and evolution of stiffness and strength values for the model discontinuity elements must follow a different logic than that adopted for fractures and true joints. A new concept to better represent the behaviour of intrablock structure in explicit numerical models is proposed and tested in this paper by means of finite element method (FEM) analysis and case study data from a 1, 200 m deep drift. This approach changes the stiffness and strength values of failed intrablock structural elements between pre‐peak ("primary"), post‐peak ("secondary"), and ultimate ("tertiary") states. The FEM models in the tertiary state match 96 % of overbreak patterns along the case drift, versus 80 % in primary state models. These findings suggest that the proposed method is a good option to more accurately model the influence of intrablock structure on rockmass behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it