MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196108827 · doi:10.7202/1034063ar

(Im)mobilité internationale : les inégalités au sein des catégories populaires face à la migration

2015· article· fr· W2196108827 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited Nations Development Programme
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’examen des trajectoires migratoires de citoyens comoriens issus des catégories populaires permet de mettre en lumière de fortes inégalités dans leur rapport à la mobilité, dans leur accès à l’émigration et dans leur capacité à transformer la mobilité spatiale en mobilité sociale ascendante. Leur plus ou moins grande possession de ressources scolaires et culturelles ainsi que la connaissance pratique et directe de l’émigration au sein de la famille viennent dessiner des frontières internes à ce groupe social. L’article montre également comment la migration participe significativement à la recomposition des catégories populaires dans le pays d’origine en permettant à ceux qui ont un peu plus de ressources d’obtenir une ascension sociale individuelle ou familiale et en laissant les plus précaires à l’écart de ce processus. La migration favorise donc tout autant la mobilité que la reproduction sociale au sein des milieux populaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it