Sarraute: Cette puissance d'envoûtement. Possession, conjuration, figuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans Enfance, Nathalie Sarraute raconte des souvenirs qui se rapportent presque toujours à des mots qui ont déclenché en elle des effets puissants, corporels. Enfance est le récit morcelé d’une sorte de névrose obsessionnelle infantile qui permet de donner corps fictif à la genèse d’une écriture. Les tropismes sont les mouvements psychiques inaccessibles à l’énoncé, mais non pas au corps de la parole. La notion d’envoûtement que propose ce dossier m’invite à relire l’œuvre de cet écrivain à travers la figuration recherchée de cette agression originaire, quelque chose comme l’envoûtement constitutif du sujet et de son rapport à l’autre.AbstractIn Enfance, Nathalie Sarraute recounts memories of her childhood which are almost only memories of words that triggered in her powerful effects tangible. As we know, tropisms are movements psychic inaccessible to the statement but not to the body. The notion of envoûtement invites me to reread the work of this writer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.053 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".